This article published by the International Association of Privacy Professionals delves into key questions shaping the regulation of non-identifiable data: whether data with residual re-identification risk still personal information; who sets re-identification risk management standards; and whether non-identifiable data, like synthetic data, should be regulated to mitigate against inappropriate uses of data and models. Informed by a study examining Canadian privacy laws and regulator interviews, the article argues against an overly cautious approach, asserting that a zero-risk standard impedes the societal and technological benefits of technology. It advocates for a more pragmatic regulatory framework to balance risk and innovation.

Precaution, Ethics & Risk: Perspectives on Regulating Non-identifiable Data
RELATED ARTICLES
AdminFeb 6, 20231 min read
Real-World Evidence Firm Aetion Grabs Privacy-Protected Synthetic Data Provider Replica Analytics
This article from Fierce Healthcare reports on Aetion's acquisition of Replica Analytics, a company specializing in generating ...
Start Reading AdminFeb 6, 20231 min read
Replica Analytics Using Synthetic Data to Ease Medical Researchers’ Pain
This article in Ottawa Business Journal provides some background on Replica Analytics as an Ottawa start-up leveraging ...
Start Reading AdminFeb 6, 20231 min read
10 Recommendations for Regulating Non-identifiable Data
This article published by the International Association of Privacy Professionals outlines key recommendations for regulating ...
Start Reading